Some cars are just instant home runs. When Mercedes-AMG debuted the first AMG GT back in 2014, you didn’t have to be a car fanatic to appreciate the stunning good looks or throaty exhaust rumble of the newest member of the always fun Grand Touring market.

Ay caramba, a four cylinder grand tourer for $107,000? That's what it'll cost buyers to own the new 2025 Mercedes-AMG GT 43. Even if it's pricey up front, the car is actually now the cheapest in the whole AMG GT lineup.

Mercedes-AMG has just announced that, as of this fall, the brand sell you a new four-cylinder variant of the second-generation AMG GT coupe, for a starting price of $107,050. That makes this new entry-level AMG GT 43 more than $30,000 below the base price of the most affordable V-8 variant, the AMG GT 55.

Mercedes-AMG is launching a new entry-level "43" variant of its iconic AMG GT Coupe as it enters its second generation and to land one in your driveway, you'll need to set aside at least $105,900. In comparison,

The 2025 Mercedes-AMG GT 43 is the new sporty, elegant entry to the AMG GT model portfolio. Arriving at U.S. dealerships this fall, starting from $105,900, the new coupe offers an engaging dynamic driving experience,

The new base Mercedes-AMG GT 43 gives you a turbocharged 2.0-liter—and a lifetime of explaining where the other cylinders went

Mercedes-AMG models are known for their German muscle, and some can be had as a good deal on the second-hand market for those willing to look.

There are almost too many Mercedes-AMG GT variants to number, but the most exciting ones - like the AMG GT Pro - all come with a V8. The AMG GT 43, unfortunately, does not. It comes with a turbocharged 2.

The new base Mercedes-AMG GT 43 gives you a turbocharged 2.0-liter—and a lifetime of explaining where the other cylinders went

Unlike the more powerful AMG GT55 and GT63, the new entry-level GT43 coupe forgoes AWD for RWD fun that's less expensive.

Mercedes-AMG has revealed the 2025 GT 43 coupe. The 4-cylinder model hasalf the cylinders of the GT 55, but only 53 fewer horses — for more than $30,000 less.